Ensuring sustained funding flows during the transition from relief to development remains a largely unresolved challenge and constitutes one of the main characteristics of the transition ‘gap’. Despite compelling evidence of the linkages between risk reduction and development, it is still much easier to mobilize support for relief efforts than for recovery activities.

In the absence of agreed funding frameworks for recovery, UNCTs have used the appeal mechanism by expanding its scope to include funding for (early) recovery activities; these transitional appeals have experienced varying success, in part due to the lack of awareness, combined with the absence of dedicated tools or funds, on the part of to respond to such requests.

Nevertheless, experience to date shows that success hinges on the extent to which the Appeal reflects and is based on a solid strategic approach and the level of engagement with government and donors from the outset. Building on lessons learned to date , the UNDG has also developed specific guidance on how to incorporate recovery activities in appeals, in addition to and beyond their traditional humanitarian focus.